Gender Difference Between Youth Problems

The study was undertaken to study the youth Problems of male and female college students of district Jalna (M.S.). The sample of the study consisted 400college students (200 male students and 200 female students). Randomly secreted from Difference College of Jalna District(M.S.). Youth Problem Inventory by Dr. M. Verma(2004) was used data collection. The data collected was statistically treated by using mean, SD and one way ANOVA. The findings of the study revealed that Girls have significantly high Family Problem than Boy. Girls have significantly high School Problem than Boy. There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Social problem. There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Personal Problem. Girls have significantly high Youth Problem than Boy


INTRODUCTION
The word youth or adolescent can be interchanged. The synonyms of youth are teenager, youngster, adolescent, stripling etc. Mudasir, Shazia Majeed (2000), "Youth means quality or condition of being young, immature, or inexperienced; the period between childhood and maturity especially adolescence and early adulthood; the freshness, vigor or vitality characteristics of young people; any period of early development; a young person, especially a young man or boy".
Youth are the hope of the future of the world or in other words the future of the world lies in the hands of the youth. It is they who build up the nations. Youth are the resources of country and it their empowerment is the empowerment of a nation. The present generations have their hope in the youth. They are productive and active people who are capable of large undertakings. In the midst of their strong and stubborn nature we realize the fact that there are several problems among the present day youth. These problems are most often psychological and are developed during their stages of development. There is no other way but to recognize, identify and find out remedies to such problems of the youth. The science of psychology and the Psycho analysis has been contributed much to the youth related problems and solutions. Youth psychology is a branch of psychology that develops very fast. Let the youth of the world merit from the psychological innovations of psyche of the youth.

Review of Literature:
Srishti Singh, (2016) indicated that no significant gender differences lie in family problems, college problems, social problems or personal problems of college students. Anjana s. Chauhan  (2011) indicated that significant difference was found between rural and urban adolescents in family, school, social and personal problems. Male and female groups differed significantly only in personal problems. Significant difference was found among all the three levels of self esteem and their personal and family problems. Overall findings suggest those rural adolescents suffer more problems than urban adolescents and thus highlight. The need of community based mental health care. Satinder Dhillon,(2015) this study indicated that male and female students have the same means on their personal problems. The mean scores of female students in case of family, socio-emotional and educational problems were more than their counterparts but this difference is statistically not significant. Thus it was concluded that there is no significant difference in the mean scores of youth problems of male and female students. Irshad Ali Dar and Latief Ahmad Tali, (2014) this study found that the adolescent boys and girls of Kashmir have high adjustment problems in various areas like family, school, social and on a personal front. It was found that the adolescent boys and girls of Kashmir do not differ significantly with each other in adjustment problems.

Statement of the Problem
To Study the Youth Problems among Boys and Girls college going Students.

Objectives
The following are main objectives of the present study.
To examine the youth problem among boys and girls college going Students.

Procedures of data collection:-
For the present study 400 sample was used and two instruments were administered individuals as well as a small group will be adopted. The subjects were called in a small group of 21-25 subjects and there seating arrangements, was made in a classroom. Following the instructions and procedure suggested by the author of the test. Tests were administered and a field copy of each test was collected. Following the same procedure the whole data was collected.

Data Analysis
The data were analyzed as follows.
The Mean and SD with graphical representation for Area of Residence (Urban and Rural College Students) on youth Problem was analyzed. A simple design was selected to adequate of statistical analysis of ANOVA in order to examine the roll of main as well as subsequently on students Youth Problem.

Results and Discussion
The analysis of data interpretation and discussion of the results are presented below.  Figure No. 01 Indicated that the mean value of two classified group seems to differ from each other on Family Problem. The mean and SD value obtained by Boy (A1) is 28.05, SD = 7.13 and second mean of Girls (A2) is 31.04, SD = 8.83 dimension on Family and F value is 14.28 and two mean is highly significant at 0.01 level and 0.05 level and both levels is significant as well as null research hypothesis is rejected (There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension with youth problem on Family. and it means that Girls have significantly high Family Problem than Boy.  12 dimension on School and F value is 12.91 and two mean is highly significant at 0.01 level and 0.05 level and both levels is significant as well as null research hypothesis is rejected (There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension with youth problem on School. and it means that Girls have significantly high School Problem than Boy.  research hypothesis is accepted its mean that (and it means that There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Social problem.  Boy students (A1) is 24.44, SD = 8.16 and second mean of Girls students (A2) is 24.71, SD = 9.57 dimension on Personal Problem and F value is 0.098 and two mean not significant at 0.01 level and 0.05 level and both levels is significant as well as null research hypothesis is accepted its mean that (and it means that There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Personal Problem. .21 and two mean is highly significant at 0.01 level and 0.05 level and both levels is significant as well as null research hypothesis is rejected (There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension with youth problem. and it means that Girls have significantly high Youth Problem than Boy.

Delimitations of the study
1) The finding of the study is based on very sample.
2) The sample was restricted to Jalna Dist. in Maharashrta.
3) The study was restricted to only B.A. arts college students (arts facility) only. 4) The study was restricted students are only 18-21 years only.

1)
Girls have significantly high Family Problem than Boy.

2)
Girls have significantly high School Problem than Boy.

3)
There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Social problem.

4)
There is no significant difference between boys and girls graduate student dimension on Personal Problem.

5)
Girls have significantly high Youth Problem than Boy.